Tuesday, April 24, 2012

Supreme Court lawyers cautious when offering one specific piece of evidence

The Supreme Court spends a vast amount of time on one question. To paraphrase Freud: What does Congress want?

The ambiguities, contradictions and unaddressed consequences in federal statutes keep the court in business. And in interpreting Congress’s work, justices employ all manner of tools, including other statutes, the court’s own precedents and sometimes a good dictionary.

Read full article >>

Add to Facebook Add to Twitter Add to Reddit Add to StumbleUpon

Joseph Lieberman Mitch McConnell Gabrielle Giffords Nancy Pelosi Barney Frank

No comments:

Post a Comment